[ad_1]
Sengkang Member of Parliament Raeesah Khan shall be questioned by the police for not disclosing particulars about an officer she mentioned spoke inappropriately to a rape sufferer,a high minister mentioned right this moment.
After failing to drive Raeesah reveal extra particulars right this moment in Parliament, Regulation and Residence Affairs Minister Ok Shanmugam ended an ungainly back-and-forth change by saying the police would press her for extra details about her feedback two months in the past in a speech on ladies’s empowerment.
“The police will examine this very critical matter additional. The officers in cost within the police will interview Ms. Khan, and any allegations of misconduct regarding particular officers shall be referred to [Singapore Police Forces’] inner affairs workplace for additional investigation,” Shanmugan mentioned.
Raeesah, of the opposition Staff’ Occasion, has refused to disclose particulars of what occurred, citing confidentiality and the chance of retraumatizing the sufferer – one thing Shanmugam tried to handle by assuring that the sufferer wouldn’t be named.
In her early August speech, Raeesah urged legislation enforcement to be extra delicate towards sexual assault victims. She cited an incident three years in the past during which she took a sufferer to a police station the place officers commented on her clothes and alcohol consumption. Raeesah instructed deploying counselors to police stations.
From how significantly violence towards ladies is handled by the courts on down, information present a big hole in allegations of sexual assault and prosecution.
Greater than 2,300 sexual assault circumstances, together with rape, had been reported to the police on common every year from 2017 to 2019. In response to police information, fewer than 330 of convictions have been obtained yearly in 14 years ending in 2019.
Shanmugam mentioned the police couldn’t discover any document of the incident Raeesah had described and requested for particulars such because the date, location, and descriptions of the officer or officers concerned.
“I wished to offer her the choice of giving us the perfect info she has however she confirms that such an incident occurred, that she had accompanied this sufferer to the police station, and that she doesn’t want to disclose the knowledge solely due to confidentiality,” Shanmugam mentioned.
He added: “Speaker, members would know that confidentiality doesn’t prolong to not telling us which police station.”
Different tales:
Don’t fear the sprinkle pit, Singapore’s Museum of Ice Cream insists it’s totes clean
Thousands petition Singapore not to rush ‘foreign interference’ bill into law
[ad_2]
Source link