The rulings from judges in Massachusetts and Rhode Island reject a controversial US Department of Agriculture claim that it could not use a contingency fund, which the agency says has $US5.3 billion ($8.1 billion) remaining in it, to help cover the benefits amid the month-long government shutdown.
Hours later, President Donald Trump said he has instructed the administration’s lawyers to ask the courts how it can legally fund the benefits as quickly as possible because the attorneys “do not think we have the legal authority to pay SNAP with certain monies we have available.”
“If we are given the appropriate legal direction by the Court, it will BE MY HONOR to provide the funding, just like I did with Military and Law Enforcement Pay.”
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, costs between $12.2 billion and $13.8 billion a month, so the judges’ orders will not cover all of the needed payments for November.
“There is no doubt that the … contingency funds are appropriated funds that are without a doubt necessary to carry out the program’s operation.”
US District Judge John McConnell in Rhode Island said. “The shutdown of the government through funding doesn’t do away with SNAP, it just does away with the funding of it.”
During proceedings yesterday, McConnell said he was ordering the government to use the contingency fund to ensure some benefits could be distributed starting November 1.
McConnell’s ruling during a hastily scheduled hearing came minutes after US District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston made a similar order.
Both judges, appointees of President Barack Obama, also said that USDA is allowed to tap into another bucket of money of nearly $26 billion to pay November SNAP benefits in full, but that decision is currently up to the administration.
Though Talwani stopped short yesterday of requiring the administration to tap into the contingency fund, she said the USDA was required to use money in that rainy-day fund to partially cover November benefits and gave it until Monday to decide whether it would use only those funds or also dip into a separate pot of money.
The Trump administration opposes tapping into those other funds, arguing in court it will hurt the child nutrition programs that the revenue supports.
Even with Trump’s directive and the judge’s rulings, millions of recipients will still face delays in getting their benefits, which were scheduled to start being distributed on November 1.
It will take time for the Department of Agriculture and states to get the money flowing again.
In the program’s decades-long history, a government shutdown has never prevented it from distributing SNAP funds to states, which administer the benefits, though the program was at risk during the 2018-2019 impasse.
The Boston lawsuit was filed earlier this week by a group of Democratic attorneys general and governors from 25 states and Washington, DC, while the case in Rhode Island was brought on Thursday by a coalition of cities, non-profits, unions and small businesses.
As the government shutdown nears its one-month mark, courts are increasingly being asked to intervene to stave off a series of dramatic developments.
Earlier this week, a federal judge in California indefinitely blocked the administration from laying off thousands of federal workers, saying the government was unlawfully using the shutdown as legal justification for the layoffs.
The administration could seek appeals. Asked earlier yesterday by CNN what the department would do if courts required USDA to tap into the contingency fund, Secretary Brooke Rollins said, “We’re looking at all the options.”
States stopped the process of issuing benefits for November after the USDA sent them a letter on October 10 ordering them to do so.
States send SNAP enrollees’ information to vendors every month so they can load funds onto recipients’ benefit cards.
Each state has a specific date by which they must send the information ahead of the new month in order for benefits to go out on time, according to the lawsuit.
Payments are made on a staggered basis throughout the month.
Talwani acknowledged the likely delay in benefits during a hearing on Thursday, and also asked about the process of providing partial payments to recipients next month since the contingency fund alone won’t cover the full amount.
“We’re dealing with the reality that … the benefits aren’t going to be there on November 1,” she said.
