[ad_1]
Lynette Dawson decided to go away residence in 1982 with out taking any belongings to make it seem to be her husband had killed her, a court docket has been advised.
Giving proof in Chris Dawson’s Sydney homicide trial on Monday, Paul Cooper stated he had met a girl he was certain was Lynette Dawson early in 1982 at a pub in Warners Bay, on Lake Macquarie. Chris Dawson has pleaded not responsible to the alleged homicide.
Cooper claimed to have struck up a dialog with the lady, who stated she had left her husband and youngsters and was working up the braveness to see her sister.
Telling the lady that the police would possibly assume she had been killed by her husband as a result of she had left all her belongings, Cooper stated he was shocked by the response.
“Once I regarded again at her, she had a distinct manner at the moment and it shocked me as a result of I assumed that may have been the intent,” he advised Justice Ian Harrison.
Cooper claimed the lady was ready for a passport and was planning to fly first to Bali after which on to a different abroad nation. She allegedly requested Cooper to guide a motel for her as a result of she had no identification.
After seeing a report on Lynette Dawson on the tv program A Present Affair three years in the past, Cooper stated he contacted Chris Dawson’s lawyer, Greg Walsh. He advised the court docket he didn’t contact the police, fearing they might be biased.
Beneath cross-examination by crown prosecutor Craig Everson SC, Cooper admitted that he had frolicked in jail for medicine, armed theft, theft, and break and enter.
He couldn’t keep in mind if he had requested the lady’s title on the day, and stated he was certain she was not carrying glasses on the time.
Regardless of Cooper claiming the lady stated her sister lived close to Warners Bay, Everson identified that Lynette Dawson’s precise sister, Pat Jenkins, lived a three-and-a-half hour drive away, within the city of Stuarts Level.
Additionally on Monday, Justice Harrison dismissed proof that Dawson sought out somebody to eliminate his spouse seven years earlier than she vanished.
Final month, Robert Silkman claimed Dawson approached him on a flight from the Gold Coast to Sydney to ask if he knew somebody who might eliminate Lynette Dawson.
Silkman’s proof was put ahead to indicate that Dawson had particular tendencies that pointed to the homicide of his spouse.
Dawson’s authorized crew attacked Silkman’s credibility, stating that he had often lied to police and the courts, and had frolicked in jail for theft and arson.
His proof was rejected, alongside testimony of three different witnesses: Judith Solomon, Roslyn McLoughlin and one recognized solely as KF, who claimed they noticed Lynette Dawson with black eyes or bruises earlier than she disappeared in January 1982.
This proof didn’t have vital probative worth, the decide stated.
The trial continues.
[ad_2]
Source link